Unfortunately, your immune system does not recognise this deficiency in your cells as a fault - It is you. So you yourself cannot eradicate such cells. And if or when their uncontrolled replication becomes cancer, your immune system still insists that - it is you. - Well, it is, isn't it.

But suppose we take a few of my cells, say, and intentionally damage their p53 in a variety of ways, and then replicate this material - or even simply its damaged p53 - in abundance by PCR - or polymerase chain reaction. Then suppose that a few cells of this material are injected into other people, irrespective of whether they yet have cells with damaged or deficient p53. Logically, the following will then have to happen: - Their immune system will wake to the fact that alien - my - cells are present, and will manufacture antibodies against them - including against the p53-deficiency factor. These antibodies then will go to combat any cells deficient in p53, mine and - intentionally - theirs, or will wait for any such cells to appear by natural mischance in the future, and act against them then.

In this way, cells - present now or occurring in the future - which otherwise potentially might result in future cancer, will be suppressed, and their potential cancers will not - will not be able to - occur. This technique may equally be applied to other species, too. Why should they have to suffer cancer unnecessarily?

If there were cases of the antibodies failing to recognise the host's damaged or deficient p53, it would be a matter of damaging the p53 of each such individual, genetically altering it and the DNA of the host cells and re-inserting these so that the immune system could then not fail to recognise that the rest of the indigenous damaged p53 is also to be suppressed - It would also do this in the case of established cancers, though to what extent as yet is only conjecture - All cancer cells are deficient in p53 however, as an essential component of the syndrome - so this may well be a means of eliminating existing cancers, and it would then prevent the development of cancers in the same person in the future. The simpler comprehensive preventative method is obviously preferable, however, and it is thought that antibodies can - if not doing so automatically - be educated to recognise characteristic damage to p53.

And it is an intriguing thought, isn't it, that perhaps - merely by waking the immune system in this way to suppress its own host's flawed cells - the cancellation of this underlying factor crucial to all cancers might even disrupt the entire cancer syndrome and therefore alone be enough to prevent all the types it can produce - And that maybe, therefore, all that other so-richly lucrative research work will be redundant.

To alter the p53 in the intended vaccine? - Well, you will need the molecular profile of p53, of course, to vary the constituents of the p53 in as many ways as possible, in order to provide the widest array of antibodies against as many variations of naturally-occurring p53-damage as possible. But this is not even very difficult - (gamma, x-, u.v., beta, slow alpha etc, and heat treatment - and the relevant moulds and viruses, remember - the lot - then, if necessary, dried and stored in trehalose at room temperature) - For the right molecular-biology team it will be child's-play - even fun! Some would do it free of charge, I'm sure, for the simple privilege of being able to contribute something so useful - for a change.

It will be necessary to remedy an increasing innate tendency to produce p53-deficient cells in descendants of those who, rather than dying as a result of the cancers that the p53-deficient cells would otherwise produce - thus taking the problem into the grave with them - therefore will instead live, of course, but it is better to cross that bridge when we come to it.

This advice is offered free, and its implementation will be cheap, and should be available to everyone; a mere few cell cultures will be needed with damaged or deficient p53 to be endlessly replicated, a single culture being effective to all except its donor or twin - in both of whom, incidentally, it could promote - not prevent - cancer.

So it will be interesting, won't it, to watch and see which disgusting creatures will try to patent this - not their idea - and so hold the suffering impoverished of humanity to ransom yet again for the sole motive of just more coin, as is done in so many other ways already - Then let us recognise and treat them for the greedy, malignant, pestilential misanthropes they are, too.

- Two birds, one stone.

We might also resolve the patent racket while we're about it - Three.

Afterthought: - Obviously, unless a specialist, you are less interested in prevention than in cure; if you haven't cancer now then... perhaps you won't have it...and so prevention is of marginal interest, whereas only if you have cancer will you be desperate for a cure, and this applies to a minority of you as yet. Well let me tell you this: you yourself have p53-deficient cells now which in the future, for unforeseeable reasons totally beyond your knowledge or control, may become cancer. And whether or not it has yet been diagnosed, a percentage of you apparently healthy folk already have cancer, and that is absolutely certain - It has simply not yet been definitively determined who has it and who has not. - Wouldn't it be a much better idea to prevent all that and not even have to consider it?

- So whether you recognise it or not, this is of vital importance to you, too. THE most cost-effective thing governments can do at this moment is to prevent ANY of the population developing cancer, which, at the very least, simply eats into 'your economies'. And for you individuals, the most important thing is for you voters to ensure that 'your governments' do what YOU need - in all ways. So all of you make sure that this is authenticated and implemented - I suggest you do that now.

P.S. - Oh, by the way, we forgot to mention: the disgusting grabbers can never be trusted, so yes, sorry chaps, of course patents are already in progress - to exclude it from those of you who, simply for cash, would exclude it from the rest of us - Have the rest of you read that 'Strong Meat' book yet? - What a damned scandal it all is.

Well, that was how the position stood, but the patent was allowed to lapse after publication, so that now anyone can do it without fear of 'legal' repercussions.

Do it how? - Like this -